<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Involuntary Attention and Web UIs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://becktench.com/hci/2009/02/09/on-involuntary-attention-and-web-uis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://becktench.com/hci/2009/02/09/on-involuntary-attention-and-web-uis/</link>
	<description>Beck Tench's webservations on Human Computer Interaction (HCI), specifically in the sweet spot where design, cognitive psychology and information meet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Summar</title>
		<link>http://becktench.com/hci/2009/02/09/on-involuntary-attention-and-web-uis/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>David Summar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://becktench.com/hci/2009/02/09/on-involuntary-attention-and-web-uis/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting post. Being wary of too many bells and whistles is something good developers know, but your observation connecting that to this research is particularly keen.

I do wonder about the research, though. So many people have little experience in purely natural settings and feel as uncertain of themselves there, I&#039;d speculate, as the proverbial country boy would in the Big Apple. Mightn&#039;t people feel threatened in a natural setting just due to lack of familiarity? And aren&#039;t there still threats people have to monitor there, even if there&#039;s less cognitive load in such a setting?

It&#039;s ironic, though, don&#039;t you think, that clumsy designers looking to keep someone&#039;s attention on a website can attenuate that person&#039;s attention to the point they give up on a site.

Cheers...interesting blog. Glad I found it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting post. Being wary of too many bells and whistles is something good developers know, but your observation connecting that to this research is particularly keen.</p>
<p>I do wonder about the research, though. So many people have little experience in purely natural settings and feel as uncertain of themselves there, I&#8217;d speculate, as the proverbial country boy would in the Big Apple. Mightn&#8217;t people feel threatened in a natural setting just due to lack of familiarity? And aren&#8217;t there still threats people have to monitor there, even if there&#8217;s less cognitive load in such a setting?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic, though, don&#8217;t you think, that clumsy designers looking to keep someone&#8217;s attention on a website can attenuate that person&#8217;s attention to the point they give up on a site.</p>
<p>Cheers&#8230;interesting blog. Glad I found it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My life on teh interwebs: February &#171; The pitch I chew.</title>
		<link>http://becktench.com/hci/2009/02/09/on-involuntary-attention-and-web-uis/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>My life on teh interwebs: February &#171; The pitch I chew.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://becktench.com/hci/2009/02/09/on-involuntary-attention-and-web-uis/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] On Involuntary Attention and Web UIs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Involuntary Attention and Web UIs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
